Skip to content

LA County's Chaparral Clearing Sparks Controversy Over Fire Risk and Climate Change

LA County's rush to clear chaparral has raised eyebrows. Critics warn it could increase fire risk and harm wildlife, while officials insist it's a necessary step for safety.

There are plants, fencing, grass, people, poles, white building and trees.
There are plants, fencing, grass, people, poles, white building and trees.

LA County's Chaparral Clearing Sparks Controversy Over Fire Risk and Climate Change

Los Angeles County's recent decision to clear mature chaparral in the Santa Monica Mountains has sparked controversy. Claims that state tax money is used to increase fire risk and accelerate climate change have been deemed unfounded and misleading.

The project, backed by Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, was rushed through without public or scientific community consultation. The Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy has already allocated over $3 million for this purpose. However, experts argue that destroying these plants will absorb less carbon and harm wildlife, forcing them to relocate to shrinking habitats.

Old growth chaparral and sage scrub are less flammable than the invasive weeds that will replace them, exacerbating fire risk. Removing invasive grasses with grazing goats is a more viable solution, but creating massive fuel breaks is considered a waste of time and money.

Despite claims, there's no evidence that state tax money is used to increase fire risk or accelerate climate change in the Santa Monica Mountains. The decision to clear mature chaparral is counterproductive and harmful, as it absorbs less carbon and harms wildlife. Alternative solutions, such as using grazing goats to remove invasive grasses, should be considered.

Read also:

Latest