Home under threat: Grandma's residence

Home under threat: Grandma's residence

In recent discussions, the Confederation of German Employers' Associations (BDA) has put forth proposals to reform the nursing care insurance system in Germany. These proposals, if implemented, could significantly impact the financial security of elderly people and their caregivers.

The BDA's reforms aim to ensure the long-term financial sustainability of the nursing care insurance system while attempting to maintain or improve benefit security for the elderly. The proposed measures include increasing employer and employee contributions, adjusting benefit levels, encouraging private supplementary insurance, improving support structures for informal caregivers, and promoting efficiency and innovation in care services.

However, these reforms could have varied impacts. Positive effects might include more stable funding and better care quality. Negative effects could involve higher costs for employees and employers, potentially shifting more financial responsibility onto families or reducing out-of-pocket affordability for care recipients.

One of the BDA's proposals is a "sustainability factor" to limit insurance benefits if the number of people in need of care increases more than the number of contributors. This could potentially lead to a rise in the number of nursing home residents relying on social assistance. The BDA also suggests that in the first year of requiring care, people should pay for care themselves, with no benefits from the care insurance.

The black-red coalition, the ruling political alliance in Germany, is aiming to stop the rising expenditure dynamics in long-term care insurance. They are considering imposing "sustainability factors" and are considering completely abolishing financial assistance for care reform. These measures could potentially lead to the withdrawal of help for the first time since the introduction of long-term care insurance 30 years ago.

The federal government still owes long-term care insurance costs incurred during the pandemic that are not related to care. Additionally, the association of statutory health insurance funds demands that the federal government permanently pay the pension insurance contributions for caring relatives.

Economist Rothgang criticizes the federal ministry of finance for imposing strict guidelines on long-term care insurance without need. He suggests that there are alternatives to cuts in long-term care insurance that do not negatively impact elderly people who can hardly defend themselves.

The IW study, referred to by the BDA, estimates that in 2023, around 71 percent of all pensioner households could have paid the costs for the stationary care of a household member for two years, under certain assumptions. The BDA uses this study's result as an argument that people can bear even more costs themselves.

It is essential for those affected by these proposed reforms to stay informed about the current BDA reform proposals and their projected financial impacts. For precise details, consult recent official BDA statements or German government documents.

1. The BDA's proposals for nursing care insurance reform could influence the financial security of elderly individuals and their caregivers significantly.
2. The objective of these reforms is to ensure the long-term financial stability of the nursing care insurance system while preserving or enhancing benefit security for the elderly.
3. The suggested measures comprise increasing contributions from employers and employees, adjusting benefit levels, promoting private supplementary insurance, improving support for informal caregivers, and fostering efficiency and innovation in care services.
4. Even though these reforms may result in positive effects such as more stable funding and improved care quality, they could also lead to higher costs for employees and employers.
5. One proposal is the introduction of a "sustainability factor," which limits insurance benefits if the number of people in need of care surpasses the number of contributors, potentially increasing the number of nursing home residents relying on social assistance.
6. The BDA also suggests that in the first year of requiring care, people should pay for care themselves, with no benefits from the care insurance.
7. The black-red coalition is aiming to halt the escalating expenditure dynamics in long-term care insurance and is considering implementing "sustainability factors."
8. They are also considering abolishing financial assistance for care reform altogether, leading to the possible withdrawal of help for the first time since the introduction of long-term care insurance 30 years ago.
9. The federal government still owes long-term care insurance costs incurred during the pandemic that are not related to care.
10. The association of statutory health insurance funds demands that the federal government permanently pay the pension insurance contributions for caring relatives.
11. Economist Rothgang criticizes the federal ministry of finance for imposing excessive guidelines on long-term care insurance without justification.
12. He advocates alternatives to cuts in long-term care insurance that do not negatively impact elderly people who are unable to defend themselves.
13. The IW study, mentioned by the BDA, estimates that in 2023, approximately 71 percent of all pensioner households could afford to pay for the stationary care of a household member for two years, under specific assumptions.
14. The BDA utilizes this study's result to argue that people can bear even more costs themselves.
15. Staying informed about the current BDA reform proposals and their projected financial impacts is crucial for those affected by these changes.
16. For more precise details, consult recent official BDA statements or German government documents regarding nursing care insurance reform.
17. These discussions around nursing care insurance reform also touch upon issues like chronic kidney disease, COPD, type-2 diabetes, cancer, and other chronic diseases that elderly people often face.
18. Proper management of these medical conditions can contribute to maintaining a high quality of life as we age, and it is essential to understand how the reforms may impact access to care and treatments.
19. Additionally, discussing how the reforms might affect digestive health, eye health, hearing, and skin care is also significant, as these aspects are vital components of overall health-and-wellness.
20. Fitness-and-exercise, mental-health, Alzheimer's disease, autoimmune disorders, and men's health are other areas that should be considered within the context of this reform.
21. For women, issues like women's health, skin care, parenting, weight management, and breast cancer screening must be carefully addressed.
22. Issues in aging, including multiple sclerosis, migraine, and neurological disorders, also need to be taken into account as part of this vital conversation.
23. Furthermore, therapies-and-treatments available for various health-related conditions should be considered, as they could significantly impact the financial implications of these reforms.
24. Lastly, discussing the potential impact of these reforms on policies and legislation related to health-and-wellness, career development, job search, general news, crime-and-justice, learning, goal-setting, skills training, education-and-self-development, personal growth, mindfulness, war-and-conflicts, productivity, and mental health is important to ensure a well-rounded debate.

Read also: